www.varchev.com

Here’s who is most exposed to a Greek default

Rating:

12345
Loading...

If Greece were to default, who would be left holding the bag?

Investors are almost giddy over signs Greece and its international creditors are moving toward a last-minute deal that would allow the country to avoid a default that many fear could otherwise propel the country toward a eurozone exit.

But even when things looked bleak, markets remained relatively calm—unlike at the height of the eurozone debt crisis in 2011 and 2012. Part of that might simply be down to Greek fatigue, but it also reflects the fact that eurozone banks and other private-sector participants are much less exposed to Greece than in the past. Here’s a look at some figures and charts that show who is now exposed to Greek debt.
1_1

As the chart above from Copenhagen-based Danske Bank shows, as of March Greece’s outstanding debt stood at 312.7 billion euros ($349.6 billion). Of that, €231.2 billion is in the form of loans, with €205 billion belonging to the institutions, or the “official” sector (as opposed to the private sector). The institutions include the International Monetary Fund, the eurozone’s European Financial Stability Facility and bilateral loans from eurozone countries.

The fact that so much of Greece’s debt is seen in the hands of official creditors is one reason analysts say investors have remained relatively sanguine throughout the latest chapter of the drama.

“The private sector “has almost no direct exposure to Greece anymore,” wrote strategists at J.P. Morgan Cazenove, in a Monday note urging clients to get back into German stocks.

Meanwhile, eurozone banks have cut their exposure and their leverage levels, they noted.

“Eurozone banks show total €5b billion leverage, which contrasts with the system’s €32 billion balance sheet. Regional activity momentum, credit backdrop and the level of the euro are significantly more constructive now versus the ’11 & ’12 episodes,” they wrote.

Here’s Danske Bank with a graphic showing how European banks have cut their exposure to Greece (though exposure has ticked up since bottoming in 2012), with an accompanying chart showing how contagion from Greece to other peripheral bond markets has been much more limited this time around:

Indeed, it is a far cry from 2012 when fears over relatively tiny Greece sparked contagion across the periphery of the eurozone. That drove borrowing costs for Spain, the eurozone’s fourth -largest economy, and Italy, its third-largest, to dangerous levels. Bailouts for one or both of those countries would likely have strained Europe’s resources to the breaking point, potentially bringing the entire euro project to a humiliating end.

2_2

That is what prompted ECB President Mario Draghi in the summer of 2012 to pledge to do “whatever it takes” within the bank’s mandate to preserve the euro, eventually setting up the Outright Monetary Transaction, or OMT, program. Though never-used, the existence of the backstop helped calm contagion fears.

Now, the ECB is engaged in outright bond-buying via its quantitative easing program in an effort to fend off deflation in the eurozone.

As long as QE remains in place “concerns over debt sustainability for key euro sovereigns will be limited,” said Antonio Roldan Mones, London-based analyst at Eurasia Group, a risk consulting firm.

So no worries then? Not so fast. Skeptics still fear the potential for unforeseen consequences in the event of a Greek default or a Greek exit.

See: Investors risk complacency over Greece.

The euro EURUSD, +0.0982% fell versus the dollar Tuesday but is up 1.7 % since the beginning of the month.

Financial markets “appear to have become more relaxed—we would say complacent—about the potential fallout” from a Greek default or exit, said Julian Jessop, economist at Capital Economics, in a note dated Tuesday.


 Varchev Traders
RECCOMEND WAS THIS POST USEFUL FOR YOU?
If you think, we can improve that section,
please comment. Your oppinion is imortant for us.
WARNING: Any news, opinions, research, data or other information contained within this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment or trading advice. Varchev Finance Ltd. expressly disclaims any liability for any lost principal or profits which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on such information. Varchev Finance Ltd. may provide information, quotes, references and links to or from other sites and blogs and other sources of economic and market information as an educational service to its clients and prospects and does not endorse the opinions or recommendations of the sites, blogs or other sources of information.
Varchev Finance

London


25 Canada Square, Level 33, office 50, Canary Wharf London, E14 5LQ +44 20 3608 6256

Universal numbers

World Financial Markets - 0700 17 600    Varchev Exchange - 0700 115 44

Varchev Finance Ltd is registered in the FCA (FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY) with a passport in the United Kingdom: FCA, United Kingdom - registration number: 494 045, which allows provision of financial services in the United Kingdom.

Varchev Finance Ltd strictly comply with the statutes of the European directive MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments). targeting increased efficiency, transparency and uniformity of financial instruments.
Varchev Finance Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Supervision Commission - Sofia, Bulgaria: License number RG-03-02-05 / 15.03.2006

The information on this site is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.


Disclaimer:

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 63,41% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

chat with dealer
chat with dealer
Cookies policy