www.varchev.com

How Low Can the FANG Stocks Go? Traders Search for a Bottom

Back where we started

Rating:

12345
Loading...

How long can they go?

This is the key issue Wall Street traders are trying to answer on the biggest tech and internet shares that are among the most dramatic victims after pulling up the indexes for most of the year.

The so-called FANG shares collapsed strongly this month, after the disappointing prospect of global growth, smashed into the dust and dust the thesis that the high values ​​of the shares were supported by the foundation. Amazon.com Inc. and Netflix Inc. saw a particular weakness, with some of the most preferred companies getting an equally aggressive downward move, as the moods that gave them positive bets now work against them.

Other shares of the group, including Facebook Inc. and Alphabet Inc. also saw double-digit declines in recent weeks. This sale is "quite another game," said Bruce Bittles, chief investment strategist at Baird & Co.

"Markets were over-bought on these names, and now there is a release of these positions, just as happened with the marijuana industry," Bittles said, talking about another hot-for-weeks sector. "Now the negative impulse is so strong that it crushes all attempts to raise, people continue to try to determine the bottom and at the same time lose, trying to catch falling knives, but this decline has not yet reached the foundation."

Bitles says he thinks the waves will not turn, before 90% of the trade volume for a single session is not positive. "I look for surrender, then raise."

Amazon dropped 4.1% on Tuesday, the third consecutive downgrade session, even after the wider market rose. The company is still on track to record its worst month since November 2008, and the sale has sent it to the lowest intraday levels since April. At the same time, Netflix fell 4.8 percent, the stock recording its worst month since April 2012.

Michael Matousek, Head Trader, U.S. Global Investors Inc., said investors are now paying a lot of attention to the fund, especially in a precarious environment like the current one, marked by rising interest rates and a potential worsening of the trade war. Amazon and Netflix appear to be too costly compared to traditional valuation methods, one reason why investors started to turn to "old tech" names that have lower growth but also much lower values.

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.

Graphics: Used with permission from Bloomberg Finance L.P.


 Trader Aleksandar Kumanov

Read more:

RECCOMEND WAS THIS POST USEFUL FOR YOU?
If you think, we can improve that section,
please comment. Your oppinion is imortant for us.
WARNING: Any news, opinions, research, data or other information contained within this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment or trading advice. Varchev Finance Ltd. expressly disclaims any liability for any lost principal or profits which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on such information. Varchev Finance Ltd. may provide information, quotes, references and links to or from other sites and blogs and other sources of economic and market information as an educational service to its clients and prospects and does not endorse the opinions or recommendations of the sites, blogs or other sources of information.
Varchev Finance

London


25 Canada Square, Level 33, office 50, Canary Wharf London, E14 5LQ +44 20 3608 6256

Universal numbers

World Financial Markets - 0700 17 600    Varchev Exchange - 0700 115 44

Varchev Finance Ltd is registered in the FCA (FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY) with a passport in the United Kingdom: FCA, United Kingdom - registration number: 494 045, which allows provision of financial services in the United Kingdom.

Varchev Finance Ltd strictly comply with the statutes of the European directive MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments). targeting increased efficiency, transparency and uniformity of financial instruments.
Varchev Finance Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Supervision Commission - Sofia, Bulgaria: License number RG-03-02-05 / 15.03.2006

The information on this site is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.


Disclaimer:

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 63,41% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

chat with dealer
chat with dealer
Cookies policy