www.varchev.com

Lockheed Martin vs. United Technologies: Which Is the Better Dividend Bet?

Rating:

12345
Loading...

Amid the skittishness of the market, the prime focus of rattled investors is preventing further erosion of wealth.
Investors are looking for safe dividend plays that will ensure a regular income stream, even if stocks are bruised further.
But we think that the market presents an opportunity for lucrative total returns.

Sometimes, however, it is difficult to compare companies in the same sector.

For instance, choosing between aerospace and defense industry giants Lockheed Martin (LMT - Get Report) and United Technologies (UTX - Get Report) is no easy task when deciding which stock best serves long-term wealth-building needs.

Stock Price Performance
9be9b0c251cbcd0456ff8eec503fed0e
UTX data by YCharts

During the past three months, United Technologies has seen its stock drop by nearly 12%. Meanwhile, Lockheed Martin stock's has lost about 5.3%
The gap between the two widens when looking longer term at a year, with shares of United Technologies losing 29% in value and Lockheed Martin's stock actually registering gains of more than 6%.
c4587acc455357cbedf570faf3c1e9fc
Dividends and Valuations

At a nearly 3% yield, both stocks seem to be good income opportunities. But digging deeper shows that the fall in United Technologies' stock price is probably why its yield looks attractive.
A look at payout history shows that Lockheed Martin's 13 years of continuous dividend growth overshadows that of United Technologies, which has increased dividends for the past four years.
However, a look at the forward price/earnings to growth ratio of 1.46 shows that United Technologies seems to offer more value than Lockheed Martin's ratio of 2.15,most likely due to the stock's decline.
Earnings Performance

Lockheed Martin beat estimates for the fourth quarter with earnings of $3.01 a share, compared with the $2.94 a share expected by analysts. The company's fourth-quarter revenue was $12.92 billion, beating estimates by about 6.7%.
With the successful closure of the Sikorsky acquisition and completion of the strategic review of Lockheed Martin's IS&GS businesses to be merged with Leidos, which will unlock $5 billion in estimated enterprise value for Lockheed Martin's shareholders, the company can put these costs behind it.
Lockheed Martin's record backlog has enthused investors. The news that the U.S. Defense Department plans to buy 404 Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jets over the next five years is also encouraging.
United Technologies, meanwhile, hasn't been as fortunate.
The company's fourth-quarter earnings per share beat Wall Street expectations by a penny, but revenue of $14.65 billion fell short by $700 million.
With just one of the company's four segments predicted to have operating income growth in 2016, the year seems like a forgettable one for United Technologies.
Although United Technologies' Pratt & Whitney unit will also likely benefit from an F-35 order, technical problems with Airbus' A320neo's engines have been distressing. Qatar Airways first flagged technical snags in Pratt & Whitney engines' performance and threatened to cancel orders.
United Technologies, however, looks better than Lockheed Martin when it comes to cash positions. Lockheed Martin has cash in hand of more than $1.1 billion, versus debt of more than $15.3 billion. United Technologies' $7.08 billion in cash, versus debt of $20.42 billion, puts it in a slightly better position.

Analyst Estimates
In terms of earnings-per-share growth, analysts are more bullish on Lockheed Martin.They estimate a 3.5% rise this year and a 7.8% gain in 2017 for United Technologies,while projections for Lockheed Martin stand at more than 9% this year and 16% for 2017.
However, when it comes to stock prices, United Technologies displays higher upside probability owing to its recent fall.


 Varchev Traders

Read more:

RECCOMEND WAS THIS POST USEFUL FOR YOU?
If you think, we can improve that section,
please comment. Your oppinion is imortant for us.
WARNING: Any news, opinions, research, data or other information contained within this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment or trading advice. Varchev Finance Ltd. expressly disclaims any liability for any lost principal or profits which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on such information. Varchev Finance Ltd. may provide information, quotes, references and links to or from other sites and blogs and other sources of economic and market information as an educational service to its clients and prospects and does not endorse the opinions or recommendations of the sites, blogs or other sources of information.
Varchev Finance

London


25 Canada Square, Level 33, office 50, Canary Wharf London, E14 5LQ +44 20 3608 6256

Universal numbers

World Financial Markets - 0700 17 600    Varchev Exchange - 0700 115 44

Varchev Finance Ltd is registered in the FCA (FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY) with a passport in the United Kingdom: FCA, United Kingdom - registration number: 494 045, which allows provision of financial services in the United Kingdom.

Varchev Finance Ltd strictly comply with the statutes of the European directive MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments). targeting increased efficiency, transparency and uniformity of financial instruments.
Varchev Finance Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Supervision Commission - Sofia, Bulgaria: License number RG-03-02-05 / 15.03.2006

The information on this site is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.


Disclaimer:

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 63,41% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

chat with dealer
chat with dealer
Cookies policy