www.varchev.com

Quant Factors Go Silent in U.S. Stocks Raising Leverage Par anoia

Rating:

12345
Loading...

 

Quant Factors Go Silent in U.S. Stocks Raising Leverage Paranoia

The pain of an almost paralyzed stock market has seeped its way into the money machine of equity quants, raising anxiety levels among analysts who say they’ve seen this movie before.
It’s below the surface, where collections of look-alike stocks grouped according to investment traits like cheapness or profitability have fallen into even deeper slumber than the market as a whole. Average daily price swings in market-neutral momentum and volatility are the smallest in four years, data compiled by Bloomberg show.
So puny are the payouts that concern is building among analysts that quantitative managers will react by taking ill- advised risks. Rarely ones to wait, traders in this mathematical soup sometimes look to juice up returns.
“If you’re in a long-in-the-tooth factor that everyone is involved in, that’s going down in volatility, one way to offset the reduced returns is with leverage,” said Mark Connors, the global head of risk advisory at Credit Suisse Group AG. “For any event, whether it’s a blip or a big macro event, there’s then a greater change of sharp deleveraging.”
Connors says clients have been calling his desk to report signs of rising leverage in markets. They also want to know if this could lead to forced selling among quant funds that control as much as $500 billion.
If it all sounds a little overbaked, the narrative has precedent in an event known as the “quant quake” of 2007, when hidden market dislocations caused a chain reaction of selling among program funds. Then as now, rumblings broke out at a time of equity torpor, with the VIX dipping below 10 and markets acting immune to all kinds of risk.

bloom4
Quants like to say they’re uncorrelated with other assets, an attractive characteristic when the market goes dead. But they don’t look very uncorrelated right now. Long-short portfolios turned to factors are as zombified as everything else.
Market-neutral momentum and volatility, for example, are on track to post the calmest year since 2013, as judged by their average daily price swings, according data compiled by Bloomberg. Profitability, growth and size have been moving more than 13 percent less than their nine-year average.
There’s not much to do to combat the muted movements. Sure, you could dig for lesser-known factors that provide higher returns, but it’s a daunting task requiring increasingly expensive and elusive data. (Some shops to invest in
crowdsourcing.) Failing that, there’s only a handful of widely accepted factors, so quants may be taking similar bets with more money backing them to juice returns.
“There’s not much meat left on the bone,” said Connors.
“The bear story is that they’re all in the same trade.”
Crowdedness is the essential ingredient in a selloff and quant gross exposure to the equity market is the highest it’s been since Credit Suisse began tracking the data in 2012. Though it captures the growth of the industry, the gross exposure may also suggest leverage at play, said Connors.
Still, Credit Suisse analysis suggests that one day of volatility, especially those of the politically induced nature like Wednesday, would not cause any significant deleveraging. A shock in rates or currency — typically low volatility assets — would be needed for a big reaction, said Connors.
Even if a risk event does occur, there could be a silver lining. More volatility could also mean more opportunity, according to Alan Marantz, a partner at Fort LP, a Chevy Chase, Maryland-based quantitative hedge fund which manages more than
$3.5 billion.
“In the short term, with volatility low and the market moving sideways, there’s less risk currently but investors increase risk to achieve returns in these environments,” Marantz said. “If managers need to exit, arguably that could create more opportunity for us because we’re trying to find companies trading at attractive valuations, and they get inexpensive because the market is trying to sell them for some reason.”

Source: Bloomberg Pro Terminal

Senan Fuchedzhiev - Trader


 Varchev Traders

Read more:

RECCOMEND WAS THIS POST USEFUL FOR YOU?
If you think, we can improve that section,
please comment. Your oppinion is imortant for us.
WARNING: Any news, opinions, research, data or other information contained within this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment or trading advice. Varchev Finance Ltd. expressly disclaims any liability for any lost principal or profits which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on such information. Varchev Finance Ltd. may provide information, quotes, references and links to or from other sites and blogs and other sources of economic and market information as an educational service to its clients and prospects and does not endorse the opinions or recommendations of the sites, blogs or other sources of information.
Varchev Finance

London


25 Canada Square, Level 33, office 50, Canary Wharf London, E14 5LQ +44 20 3608 6256

Universal numbers

World Financial Markets - 0700 17 600    Varchev Exchange - 0700 115 44

Varchev Finance Ltd is registered in the FCA (FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY) with a passport in the United Kingdom: FCA, United Kingdom - registration number: 494 045, which allows provision of financial services in the United Kingdom.

Varchev Finance Ltd strictly comply with the statutes of the European directive MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments). targeting increased efficiency, transparency and uniformity of financial instruments.
Varchev Finance Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Supervision Commission - Sofia, Bulgaria: License number RG-03-02-05 / 15.03.2006

The information on this site is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.


Disclaimer:

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 63,41% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

chat with dealer
chat with dealer
Cookies policy