The use of machines in financial markets is only getting more prolific, replacing humans in everyday investment decisions.
Just take a look at the chart below from Macquarie Bank showing the volume of transactions conducted by automated trading strategies (ATS) based on latest data released by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
No matter the asset class, the dominance of algorithmic trading continues to grow.
"ATS accounts for 72% of trading in US equity indices, 75% of International equities indices, 84% of G10 currencies and 70% US Treasuries, almost 60% of base metals and 65% of crude oil," Macquarie says.
With machines now increasing trading between themselves, taking the human element of investment decisions, Macquarie asks the valid question: do fundamentals actually matter anymore?
"Although it is true that people design rules that machines follow, machine learning is proliferating and hence direct human contribution is falling," Macquarie says.
"It also eliminates human 'hesitancy' and 'thought', with crowded repricing done in split seconds — in either direction — and hence 5% plus moves are now the new 1%.
"It explains how something that was good yesterday becomes bad today."
Not only does that create the potential for short bouts of increased volatility across asset classes, Macquarie says it creates a scenario where policy announcements are dictated to drive the reaction of the machines, rather than human behaviour.
"This has major policy implications, as asset prices have emerged as the key variable driving real economy decisions, from consumption to investments," Macquarie says.
"When the Fed talks to the market, it is no longer targeting humans but rather it aims to trigger machines and steer trades."
Given there's no sign of automation slowing down across financial markets, one has to wonder whether allowing machines to dictate both asset price valuations and economic policy is a wise path to go down.
Will it make life easier for people or lead to policy mistakes and hardship?
An interesting question worth pondering.
Source: BI
Read more:
25 Canada Square, Level 33, office 50, Canary Wharf London, E14 5LQ +44 20 3608 6256
World Financial Markets - 0700 17 600 Varchev Exchange - 0700 115 44
Varchev Finance Ltd is registered in the FCA (FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY) with a passport in the United Kingdom: FCA, United Kingdom - registration number: 494 045, which allows provision of financial services in the United Kingdom.
Varchev Finance Ltd strictly comply with the statutes of the European directive MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments). targeting increased efficiency, transparency and uniformity of financial instruments.
Varchev Finance Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Supervision Commission - Sofia, Bulgaria: License number RG-03-02-05 / 15.03.2006
The information on this site is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
Disclaimer:
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 63,41% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.