www.varchev.com

The end of „Too-Big-to-Fail“ banking era

Rating:

12345
Loading...

World leaders are set to endorse plans by regulators to end the era of too-big-to-fail banksand backed proposals to wrap up sweeping reforms of rules for the global banking system.

The Financial Stability Board, created by the Group of 20 nations after the 2008 credit crunch, last week put forward a plan on how the world’s biggest banks can collapse without taxpayer bailouts. The proposals, which force bond investors to take losses if banks fail, are due to come into effect in two steps starting in 2019.

The rules for “total loss absorbing capacity” comes on top of measures that have forced banks to hold many times the amount of equity they had in the run-up to 2008. The FSB has also ordered lenders to issue bonds that can stop paying coupons and can be written off or converted into shares to preserve capital.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which sets international standards for banking regulation, said on Friday that its post-crisis reforms are set to be completed next year with new rules for trading books and for ways to calculate the riskiness of assets.

Under the rules approved by the G-20, the world’s 30 biggest banks will have to have outstanding liabilities and instruments “readily available for bail in” equivalent to at least 16 percent of risk-weighted assets in 2019, rising to 18 percent in 2022. Chinese banks, among the world’s largest, have been given extra time to issue the securities they need to meet the FSB’s requirements. The three biggest -- Agricultural Bank of China Ltd., Bank of China Ltd., and Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. China Construction Bank Corp., was added to the FSB’s list last month.

All this will reflect very strongly on the potential for a net profit of banks in the first half of 2016. It will reflow off-balance sheet assets and internal credit-rating rules, which will reflect directly on the spreads on the debt market, especially in corporate bonds and debt derivatives. For smaller banks is possible wave of mergers and acquisitions.

G.Hristov / Head of Fundamental Analyzes

(by data from Bloomberg)


 Varchev Traders
RECCOMEND WAS THIS POST USEFUL FOR YOU?
If you think, we can improve that section,
please comment. Your oppinion is imortant for us.
WARNING: Any news, opinions, research, data or other information contained within this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment or trading advice. Varchev Finance Ltd. expressly disclaims any liability for any lost principal or profits which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on such information. Varchev Finance Ltd. may provide information, quotes, references and links to or from other sites and blogs and other sources of economic and market information as an educational service to its clients and prospects and does not endorse the opinions or recommendations of the sites, blogs or other sources of information.
Varchev Finance

London


25 Canada Square, Level 33, office 50, Canary Wharf London, E14 5LQ +44 20 3608 6256

Universal numbers

World Financial Markets - 0700 17 600    Varchev Exchange - 0700 115 44

Varchev Finance Ltd is registered in the FCA (FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY) with a passport in the United Kingdom: FCA, United Kingdom - registration number: 494 045, which allows provision of financial services in the United Kingdom.

Varchev Finance Ltd strictly comply with the statutes of the European directive MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments). targeting increased efficiency, transparency and uniformity of financial instruments.
Varchev Finance Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Supervision Commission - Sofia, Bulgaria: License number RG-03-02-05 / 15.03.2006

The information on this site is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.


Disclaimer:

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 63,41% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

chat with dealer
chat with dealer
Cookies policy