www.varchev.com

This chart is a ticking time bomb for stocks

Rating:

12345
Loading...

The last six years for the U.S. stock market have been an indomitable buying orgy fueled by the Federal Reserve's zero interest rate policy, causing the S&P 500 to triple in value. One metric says it may have gone too far.

Borrowing to buy stocks, as measured by the NYSE monthly margin debt figures, ended 2014 at its highest level relative to the size of the U.S. economy since 1929. In absolute terms, it's the highest ever.

"If this doesn't count, then we might as well throw away everything we've ever learned about risk because there is none," said Alan Newman, who sent this data to customers of his Crosscurrents newsletter last week. "The manias of 2000 and 2007 now both look like small potatoes by comparison. This is total insanity."

As noted on Newman's in chart, buying stocks on margin peaked in 2007 before the popping of the housing market bubble, as well as in March 2000, exactly when the Nasdaq Composite's frenzied tech boost ended, causing share prices to be cut in half.

While too often ignored by the masses, this indicator has a storied history among long-time market data crunchers. It was, after all, buying stocks on margin that was the single cause of the infamous crash of 1929.

But like any single indicator, its track record isn't perfect. Elevated buying on margin can go on for long period of times before it has consequences, history shows. And stock borrowing itself is not a bad thing. In fact, signs of a pickup can mark the start of a healthy bull market. And some of this elevated borrowing can be due to risk arbitrage related to M&A.

Even Newman admits this is not a call to sell all stocks tomorrow, but that doesn't mean it should be ignored.

At the very least, traders said, elevated buying on margin could make 2015 a bumpier ride than the last few years because it can exaggerate the market's moves to the downside. As stocks fall, margin calls beget more selling and so on.

"This chart on margin debt suggests that the 'cash on the sidelines' them has run its course," said Steve Cortes of Veracruz TJM. "In fact, with both margin debt and total market cap at nose-bleed highs relative to GDP, it seems that equity prices are at least fully valued, if not dangerously flirting with bubble-like prices."


 Varchev Traders
RECCOMEND WAS THIS POST USEFUL FOR YOU?
If you think, we can improve that section,
please comment. Your oppinion is imortant for us.
WARNING: Any news, opinions, research, data or other information contained within this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment or trading advice. Varchev Finance Ltd. expressly disclaims any liability for any lost principal or profits which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on such information. Varchev Finance Ltd. may provide information, quotes, references and links to or from other sites and blogs and other sources of economic and market information as an educational service to its clients and prospects and does not endorse the opinions or recommendations of the sites, blogs or other sources of information.
Varchev Finance

London


25 Canada Square, Level 33, office 50, Canary Wharf London, E14 5LQ +44 20 3608 6256

Universal numbers

World Financial Markets - 0700 17 600    Varchev Exchange - 0700 115 44

Varchev Finance Ltd is registered in the FCA (FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY) with a passport in the United Kingdom: FCA, United Kingdom - registration number: 494 045, which allows provision of financial services in the United Kingdom.

Varchev Finance Ltd strictly comply with the statutes of the European directive MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments). targeting increased efficiency, transparency and uniformity of financial instruments.
Varchev Finance Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Supervision Commission - Sofia, Bulgaria: License number RG-03-02-05 / 15.03.2006

The information on this site is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.


Disclaimer:

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 63,41% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

chat with dealer
chat with dealer
Cookies policy